Skip to main contentSkip to navigationSkip to navigation
A Palestinian man carries his daughter past rubble
A Palestinian man carries his daughter past rubble in an area of Deir al-Balah, southern Gaza, destroyed by Israeli airstrikes. Photograph: Mohammed Saber/EPA
A Palestinian man carries his daughter past rubble in an area of Deir al-Balah, southern Gaza, destroyed by Israeli airstrikes. Photograph: Mohammed Saber/EPA

What is the ICJ and what is South Africa’s claim against Israel?

This article is more than 3 months old

International court of justice’s interim ruling has ordered Israel to prevent acts of genocide in Gaza and protect Palestinians

What is the ICJ?

The international court of justice (ICJ) – not to be confused with the international criminal court (ICC), which tries individuals for war crimes – is the UN’s top court. Established in 1945, it is based in The Hague and rules on disputes between countries as well as giving advisory opinions.

It has 15 judges – which has been expanded by an additional judge from each side in the Israel case – elected for nine-year terms by the UN general assembly and the security council.

What is the case that South Africa has brought against Israel?

South Africa has accused Israel of genocide in its campaign against Hamas in Gaza, saying among other things that it has the “specific intent … to destroy Palestinians in Gaza as a part of the broader Palestinian national, racial and ethnical group”.

In its 84-page filing it also says Israel has failed to prevent genocide and failed to prosecute officials who have publicly incited genocide.

What happened at The Hague?

While the court decides the case, which could last years, South Africa also wanted it to implement provisional measures that would oblige Israel “not to engage in genocide, and to prevent and to punish genocide”. Temporary measures such as this are meant to prevent a situation from worsening while the case is decided.

On Friday, the ICJ handed down its interim ruling, ordering six provisional measures to protect Palestinians in Gaza. They cover most of what South Africa asked for, with the notable exception of calling for a ceasefire.

The court ordered Israel to take action to prevent acts of genocide, including by its own forces, prevent and punish incitement to commit genocide and take measures to improve the humanitarian situation in Gaza.

The rulings are binding and cannot be appealed against, although the court has no power to enforce them.

The genocide convention, which has been ratified by 153 countries including Israel, defines genocide as “any of the following acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group”.

These acts include killing members of the group, causing them serious bodily or mental harm, destroying their living conditions so as to bring about their destruction, preventing them from giving birth and forcibly transferring their children to other groups.

The intent to carry out genocide is the “most difficult element to determine”, according to the UN definition.

What has Israel said about the case?

Immediately after the case was launched, the Israeli foreign ministry spokesperson Lior Haiat issued a strong rebuke, calling the claims “baseless” and a “blood libel”, a reference to false accusations of murder and ritual sacrifice made against Jews.

“Israel rejects with disgust the blood libel spread by South Africa in its application to the international court of justice,” Haiat said on X. “South Africa’s claim lacks both a factual and a legal basis and constitutes a despicable and contemptuous exploitation of the court.”

After Friday’s interim rulings, the Israeli prime minister, Benjamin Netanyahu, said his country was committed to international law but added: “The mere claim that Israel is committing genocide against Palestinians is not only false, it’s outrageous, and the willingness of the court to even discuss this is a disgrace that will not be erased for generations.”

Is South Africa’s case supported by other countries?

South Africa’s filing has been welcomed by the Organization of Islamic Cooperation, whose 57 members include many African countries and Muslim-majority countries such as Turkey and Malaysia, which have also made separate statements of support.

What significance will a ruling have?

The court’s ruling is final and cannot be appealed against. It cannot enforce its decisions and it is not clear that Israel would comply with it. But an adverse ruling would be detrimental to Israel’s reputation and set legal precedent.

Most viewed

Most viewed